9 octobre 2022
Contact Lens Rules
Posted by under: Non classé .
In addition, for reasons discussed in detail in the NPRM, the Commission does not consider that its complaint reporting system bears primary responsibility for the absence of complaints about violations of the contact lens rule by the prescribing physician. [114] Although the FTC does not have a complaints system dedicated exclusively to FCLCA violations, as required by the AOA, the FTC`s Complaints Assistant is configured to record and report all contact lens complaints, whether from consumers, prescribers, sellers, or others. [115] Saline is nothing more than sterile salt water. It cannot disinfect your contact lenses. If you are unsure of the type of disinfectant that is best for you and your lenses, contact your ophthalmologist for a recommendation. A patient who wants to buy contact lenses from another seller can give the prescription to that seller. If a patient does not give their prescription to that seller, the seller must receive this information from the patient and send it to a prescribing physician to verify it before selling the lenses. Several commentators have also felt that the contact lens market is functioning properly, as evidenced by the relatively high number of contact lens vendors and the seemingly competitive lens prices, and that it is therefore not necessary for the FTC to intervene to change the rule. [148] In support of this position, the AOA presented a comparative price analysis showing that the average price difference for contact lenses between online sellers and office workers was only thirty-two cents. [149] According to the ESA, this shows that the market is highly competitive and that, therefore, the FCLCA and the rule are operating as intended and, therefore, no rule change or confirmation of prescription authorization is required.
[150] Ophthalmologists advise switching to a new contact lens case about every three months. Just like your toothbrush or kitchen sponge, lens containers get dirty and need to be replaced. The Commission has requested an opinion on its snprm proposal; The sixty-day comment period ended on July 29, 2019. In response to its RMNPS, the Commission received approximately 200 unique comments (and a total of approximately 900 comments) from various stakeholders, including prescribers and professional prescribers` organizations, contact lens manufacturers, contact lens sellers, legislators, attorneys general, economic think tanks and academics, consumer organizations and consumers themselves. [44] The majority of commentators commented on the proposal to confirm the release of orders, and many also commented on the Commission`s new proposals to review and amend orders. This statement on the basis and purpose of the final regime summarizes the relevant comments received in the NPRM and SNPRM proposals and explains the Commission`s analyses and decisions on whether or not to amend the rule. The next time you plan to wet your lenses with saliva, think again. Your mouth is full of germs, none of which can be safely placed in your eyes. You can use this recipe with another supplier or order contact lenses on the Internet, by phone or by mail. See Buying contact lenses. (b) information on the verification.
When reviewing a contact lens prescription, a vendor must provide the following information to the prescribing physician by direct communication: In the RMNPS, the Commission noted that it would give less weight to the number of checks than in the NPRM as evidence of non-compliance by the prescribing physician, since it is recognized that for some consumers – even if they are in possession of their prescription – it may be easier to enter their prescription. specifications than to present a recipe. to the seller, and because some online contact lens sellers do not have a mechanism for consumers to present their prescriptions. [118] In its comments to the RMNPS, the AOA submitted that no weight should be given to the high number of reviews for these reasons. Unlike the recognition proposal signed by the NPRM, which applied to all prescribing physicians, the SNPRM`s proposal to confirm prescription approval applied only to prescribing physicians with a financial interest in the sale of contact lenses. [56] However, one of the results of the passive examination is that the prescription is considered verified if a prescribing physician does not respond to an audit request with inaccurate information or an invalid prescription within eight business hours; Thus, passive verification allows the possibility of selling lenses to patients for whom they do not have a valid prescription. On Monday, he must respond before Tuesday at 10 a.m. If there is no answer, you can provide the contact lenses on Tuesday at 10:01. If the verification request is received by 10 p.m. On Monday, the response would be expected by Tuesday at 5 p.m.
If there is no answer, you can provide the lenses on Tuesday at 17:01. (a) Limitation period. A seller can only sell contact lenses in accordance with a prescription for contact lenses for the patient, that is, if worn responsibly, contact lenses are considered one of the safest medical devices available.
Comments are closed.
